Climate Activism

You are currently browsing the archive for the Climate Activism category.

FoE Oxfam Cards

I was recently tasked by Quit Coal with coming up with some kind of certificate for people who buy a Friends of the Earth membership, such that we could try to sell them as Christmas/Holidays gifts and raise funds.

The idea is much like what Oxfam does, selling cards that signify a donation that has gone towards, say, a goat for a family in the developing world, etc.

An example of an Oxfam gift card

So anyway i’ve just completely ripped off the Oxfam shtick, but put it in the context of what Quit Coal and FoE do. Here’s what i’ve come up with:

A bit cheeky perhaps, but we’re 80% sure Oxfam will not sue…

 

My hero Mahatma Gandhi often talked about the importance of seeing one’s political opponents as human beings. He said that no matter what you should never demand your opponent be humiliated, but rather always leave room for them to save face. He also said you should always be willing to talk to your opponents, and should always remember to never hate people, only to hate people’s behavior.

I think that he was a smart guy. And recently I had an experience that brought this home to me all over again.

This is a video I took at an action Quit Coal performed at a Mantle Mining general meeting. A couple of Quit Coallers locked on downstairs and I decided to go ask the board directly how they justify destroying farmlands in order begin exporting brown coal from Victoria and pumping our atmosphere full of the greenhouse gasses already at levels dangerous to the future of our civilization.

Quit Coal inside Mantle Mining’s general meeting. from Quit Coal on Vimeo.

Now, I have to say a couple of things about this. The first is that I actually didn’t plan to push the confrontation quite so far. A Mantle employee by the name of Winton started mocking me at one point because as I was filming my hand was shaking. I often shake in highly tense confrontational situations. It’s a fight or flight kind of response, the sympathetic (I think) nervous system kicking into action in a big way. So I was already quite heightened, and Winton mocking me pushed me into a slight ‘fight’ response as I pushed my way into their boardroom, which was actually totally unplanned.

The second thing I want to say about it is that I really didn’t know what to think about it for a long time afterwards, and still don’t in a lot of ways. It was quite new for me to come face to face with the people whose actions are spurring my activism and protest, and this novelty combined with the unplanned nature of what I was doing led to quite a raw, candid encounter.

I expressed anger, certainly, but also confusion, and desperation, and hurt. When you are finally in a room with someone you’re campaigning against they are no longer a bogeyman, and they are no longer the caricature of the money-hungry capitalist with the smoke billowing cigar that you might make them out as in a political cartoon. They are just people. They are just frail, flawed people like everyone else.

I think often more radical activists (and I suppose I fit that category, many would disagree) want everyone to take a hard line, want  everyone to regard our opponents as completely psychotic, unfeeling monsters. The idea strikes us as contemptuous, for example, that some activists or campaigners are negotiating compromises with logging companies, whalers, or indeed, ‘coal barons’ as we often terms men such as these in this video. But when you meet people in person, I think it becomes quite understandable that many would adopt what seems from the outside to be an overly compromising and conciliatory approach.

We’re not built to enjoy conflict. Not many of us, anyway. It probably triggers off mechanisms deep in our evolutionary psychological make up that tell us that we’re better off avoiding the people and places we experienced conflict in. In this case, it also triggered off in me a strong impulse to try to achieve reconciliation. After the afternoon of the action I had a strong urge to contact Ian Kraemer and to try to somehow apologize for the confrontational nature of my actions, while still making clear that I was going to strongly oppose his plans. I felt something like: look, i’ve been face to face with your humanity and I want to acknowledge it, and i’d also like you to acknowledge mine. I still hate what you’re doing, but I don’t hate you. Hating you would diminish me somehow, and I don’t have it in me to give up whatever that would mean giving up.

In the end I didn’t contact him. I shared the video through Quit Coal’s facebook and wrote something about feeling conflicted about it and left it at that. Some people found the video powerful, some found it funny, others found it depressing at how little response my words got from the Mantle board. I still fully don’t know exactly how to feel about it, but I’m sure the experience given me an even greater understanding, admiration and affinity for Gandhi’s methods and his non-violence.

As I said, I think he was a pretty smart guy.

……………………

Relatively dodgy video I chucked together of an action Quit Coal did in January in response to news Martin ferguson had been diverting resources towards spying on environmental activists.

This piece was published on the Green Left Weekly website on Saturday april 14, 2012:

On Wednesday, April 11 two officers identifying themselves as being from “security intelligence” visited my house for a chat (listen to an interview I gave the ABC here). If this week’s headlines are anything to go by (“ASIO eyes green groups” The Age12/4/12) such surprise visits will become ever more frequent for anti-coal activists like me.

To be fair to the officers in question, we had a reasonably pleasant conversation. They told me that they respect my passion and commitment for ending fossil fuel exploitation and for preventing catastrophic climate change, and also respect the right of the group I belong to — Quit Coal — to express our views in the public sphere.

What they are concerned about, however, is what they referred to as the potential for my and Quit Coal’s activism to escalate into activities that might put people and infrastructure at risk; a concern they said was especially strong given “what’s being planned” — a reference, surely, to the Baillieu government’s plans to open up Victoria’s brown coal reserves for export to Asia.

I assured them that Quit Coal is a completely peaceful and non-violent organisation that does not wish to damage critical infrastructure or cause anyone any physical harm. After about 20 minutes we shook hands and they left.

But when you’ve become an activist purely through your concern for the well-being of others, it is easy to be upset by reading, as I did yesterday, that so-called “security sources” consider you a greater risk to energy infrastructure than terrorists, especially when you have never even thought about undertaking any act of violence in the name of your cause.

It is easy to be upset to read that ASIO is being deployed, far beyond its mandate and possibly at the behest of foreign-owned corporations, to spy on environmentalists. And that this deployment — a corrupt, wasteful and possibly dangerously negligent misdirection of public funds, is supposedly based on the most tenuous of justifications — that environmentalists’ activities could escalate into a threat to energy supply and subsequently jeopardise lives, despite there being absolutely no historical precedent to support this.

It is also easy to simply feel bullied and intimidated when two large officers show up unannounced at your house, failing to properly identify themselves and making a point of indicating how much they know about you and your activities.

Yet however upsetting these things may be, I think it is important that anti-coal activists do not let our natural inclination to defend ourselves distract us from having the most important debates we need to have here.

Because the truth is, after all, that many green groups — including Quit Coal — are butting up against the law, and quite openly doing so. And when we do that it follows that we’ll eventually attract the attention of law enforcement agencies. So there should be no real shock when we do.

The real issue for me personally, then, is not that my friends and I are being watched. The real issue that deserves attention is why we have come to be in conflict with the law, and whether or not our arguments against those laws are valid. This is the real debate here, and it is one that we can’t allow to be overlooked.

A good example of what I mean was pointed out by my “security intelligence” visitors on April 11 when they referred to Premier Baillieu’s plan to export brown coal from Victoria. As our law stands, Baillieu’s plans are perfectly legal, and any plans Quit Coal may have to physically prevent the exporting of brown coal would be clearly illegal.

Yet the question that should be asked, and the question that myself and many others are raising, is whether these laws are right.

Should it be legal to open up a brand new export industry in brown coal, the most greenhouse intensive of all fossil fuels, in a world that an overwhelming scientific consensus tells us is rapidly heading towards the threshold of irreversible and catastrophic climate change?

Is it morally acceptable for wealthy industrialised countries such as ours, who the world recognises must lead the fight against climate change, to be chasing short term profits by selling our coal reserves to developing countries in Asia regardless of the consequences?

Do we not have a duty of care towards the potential victims of brown coal exports, both here and abroad, to consider their interests alongside whatever short-term benefits we think will accrue from the practice?

And are the green groups who are willing to stand in the way of brown coal exports a threat deserving of ASIO surveillance, or are they people putting themselves at risk of great personal cost to protect the lives and well-being of others on the basis of well-founded scientific opinion?

These are the questions I believe our society must be facing up to and asking ourselves. And I can only hope that we do so soon, so my new associates at “security intelligence” can go back to chasing real bad guys and leave me well alone.

This past Tuesday myself and five other activists from Quit Coal performed a sit in protest inside the foyer of Ted Baillieu’s offices in Treasury Place Melbourne. I shook off my exhaustion and wrote the following blog about it on Tueday night.

Here’s the scene:

It is 7PM at night, and four Quit Coal protestors are being led through the corridors of the Premier’s office at 1 Treasury place. They have been locked together in the foyer of the building via their necks and thumbs since 11AM in the morning.

Outside the foyer, channel’s 9, 7 and Ten have recently completed live crosses within news bulletins. The ABC, triple J, 3AW and Nova100 have also carried stories throughout the day, of both the lock-on and the Quit Coal ’die-in’ at midday.

…………………….

                                                   (Channel 10′s coverage, see 9 and 7 on our Vimeo page here)

The police, who have repeatedly told the protestors throughout the day that no politician will see them, lead the group to a meeting with Ted Bailliue’s chief of staff Tony Nutt. After an 8-hour sit-in the protestors have been offered the meeting and immunity from criminal charges in return for them consenting to unlock.

For the protestors, who are sore, and had never expected to have been allowed to stay so long or to have gained such widespread attention, it is a happy compromise.

And here’s what we said:

“Our group is strong, and growing stronger. We have a large group of supporters we can mobilize at very short notice, a core team of experienced and committed activists, a growing pool of funders, and a huge capacity to reach out through the media to millions of people in their homes.

“You can try to ignore us, but we won’t go away, and we will cause you enormous problems if you continue to sacrifice our climate, farmlands and communities to the greed of the fossil fuel industry.

“So far, you have broken an election commitment to Victoria’s 20% emissions reduction target, have crippled the wind industry, have pushed for brown coal exports, have issued CSG exploration licenses across our state, and removed regulations limiting the emissions intensity of new fossil fuel infrastructure.

“It has to stop.

“Because this is not just about inner city “Greenies” anymore. We are increasingly growing and campaigning in regional areas – reaching out to the farmers determined to defend their land from being taken away or ruined by coal seam gas fracking, and to the communities who have heard the horror stories coming from the north and want to keep the mining companies away.

“They are the National party voters you rely on to stay in power, and your government is holding power in our state by one single seat. They are voters who will abandon you if you do not uphold their rights, protect their farms, and safeguard their way of life. And if you do not begin to act responsibly on climate change, Quit Coal will happily focus our organization into helping that happen.”

And that was that.

But now we need to make good on our promise.

We need to work together to cause the Baillieu government so much political pain that they are forced to change course from the fossil fuel orgy they have in their sights.

We’ve got a plan brewing to make this a reality, but it’s going to need your help.

Take the first step now – sign up here to support our call for a moratorium on coal and coal seam gas projects in our state (already supported by two regional councils and soon to be supported by many more) and we’ll be in touch soon with next steps in the game plan.

And finally, a huge thank you needs to go out to everyone who made today one of the most rewarding days of campaigning we have ever had.

Go Quit Coal!

 

Clever.

This was the pun Seven News used in their voice over for images of me climbing Mantle Mining’s drill rig in Bacchus Marsh to protest the insanity of attempting to start exporting brown coal in a world dangerously close to the brink of catastrophic climate change.

I have to say, I’ve always been slightly weary of Seven news. I’ve seen a lot of pieces they’ve done in the past that made me feel there is a strong right-wig bias at the station. And during Climate Justice Fast! their news room was apparently even quite nasty towards my friend Mel who was trying to act as our publicist.

But on this day, they were honestly lovely. Margaret Dekker, the journalist who filed this piece, was sharp and friendly, and the piece is very reasonable:

I think that sometimes when you’re right you’re just right, and it’s hard for nearly anyone to disagree that productive farmland should be protected from being taken by mining companies. Even the police and local council out at Bacchus seemed supportive of our action, albeit behind a professional distance.

Ten news filed this piece:

In addition, Ten forwarded on a snippet of our footage to The Project, bestowing on me the great honour of being made fun of by the hilarious Dave Hughes:

As another nice little bonus from the action, Andrew Bolt wrote a blog about me! Nothing warms an activist’s heart more than some derision from Andrew, as it is a sure sign you’re threatening to make some kind of positive change in society. As usual, his blog was full of lies and misrepresentations. He says for example that I had said in 2009 that I was on a ‘total fast’. Not sure who he’s quoting with those quote marks though, as no-one in CJF ever said anything of the sort. We promised to eat again if our demands were met, but never said anything about guaranteeing we would fast to death.

I wrote to Andrew in response, challenging him to a debate about coal and climate, but no response has been forthcoming at this stage. I live in hope.

This is a poster I designed for Quit Coal‘s February 1 Rally to stop HRL.

This is a quick video I produced of Quit Coal’s ‘Big Brother Ferguson Is Watching’ action:

Big Brother Ferguson Is Watching! from Quit Coal on Vimeo.

I recently wrote this letter to a hero of mine Tim Decristopher. If you don’t know who Tim is, please check out his website at www.bidder70.org

Dear Tim,

I am a social justice (especially climate change) activist from Melbourne, Australia who has been an admirer of yours since I first came across your case in 2010. In fact I wrote a piece in Adbusters last year which discussed your case and the psychology behind the Edward Abbey quote you’ve often mentioned, that sentiment without action is ‘the ruin of the soul’. I’ve been meaning to write you for a while now, but as I’m sure you’re aware, when you’re a climate activist it can be hard to find time for many things in life.

But today I’ve finally decided to do it. It’s New Years Eve, and also my birthday, so I figure my own activism and work can take a back seat for once.

There are a lot of things I’d like to tell you, the first is just a thank you. Thanks for being the inspiration and moral beacon that you are. You are a hero to me, and a hero to thousands of others. I also believe in time you will be a hero to millions.

I believe, too, that history shows that any social movement needs uncompromisingly principled beacons such as yourself to be successful. These are the people who don’t back away from confronting ugly situations for what they are, who are willing to speak the truth about injustice, and to act strictly in line with their conscience rather than in line with the norms of the society around them. These are the people that take moral arguments to their logical conclusions.

In essence I think that the actions taken by people are the cornerstone of social change, for the inspiration and moral compass you provide to people of conscience. And while no one can ever prove it, I have strong doubts whether all those people would have found the courage required to travel to Washington and brake the law outside the White House, finally forcing a concession from Obama on the Tar Sands pipeline (however small a victory it was) If it wasn’t for you and what you have done,. I know I myself, all the way on the other side of the world, was motivated to take one arrestable action this year for climate directly because I read your speech to the judge, and because I knew you were behind bars where you do not belong.

I really want you to know that, because I know activists, and I know that what you have done and who you are challenges them to the core. I know that you are going to meet (if you haven’t already) a horde of them whose competitiveness and insecurity will lead them to act like they stayed out of jail because they wanted to use their time more ‘productively’. They will say things such as ‘if we were in jail we couldn’t organise Tar Sands rallies’. They won’t admit that if you weren’t in jail no ne would be showing up to get arrested at their rallies and actions in the first place. Not now or ever will these activists admit this, because admitting that would mean that what you have done is a vital part of the movement and that more need to follow in your footsteps.

And that, let’s face it, is a scary thing.

But I admit it. You’re probably the most valuable person the climate movement has in the entire world right now. You have inspired me. And when, as I expect will happen, I follow you to jail for standing in the path of climate catastrophe, the people inspired by me will actually have been inspired by you too.

It is in this way that what we do for good, and what you have done, has a way of resonating far beyond comprehension. So no matter what anyone ever tries to tell you or insinuate, know that not a single second you spend behind bars is wasted.

With respect,

Paul Connor

I wrote this letter to the Magistrate sentencing me for last year’s office occupation of Cygnet Capital. I was a bit nervous about it and my Lawyer recommended I didn’t use it because of its lack of repentance.

The Presiding Magistrate,

Melbourne Magistrates Court

Your Honour,

In September this year I chained myself in an act of protest to three other people in the office of the finance company Cygnet Capital. When asked to leave I refused, and was subsequently arrested for trespass.

The reason I undertook this action was to protest and draw attention to the actions of Cygnet Capital, who are underwriting the operations of another company named Mantle Mining, which plans to establish a brown coal export industry in Victoria.

The reason I oppose these companies’ actions is simple: on the authority of the world’s leading scientific authorities, a failure to adequately reduce manmade greenhouse emissions will be very likely to produce dangerous and even catastrophic climate change, leaving the members of both our species (bar perhaps a privileged few) and others to suffer the consequences of ecosystem collapse. I therefore believe that seeking to profit from exporting brown coal from Victoria – home to enough brown coal to single-handedly push the planet past the so-called ‘2° guardrail’ often spoken of by governments as the barrier beyond which climate change becomes ‘dangerous climate change’ – is deeply immoral.

I also believe that the current laws of our society have fallen far out of step with the demands of morality when it comes to climate change. As it stands, our laws hold it perfectly legal for companies such as Cygnet Capital and Mantle Mining to seek profit by knowingly contributing to the foreseeable catastrophic consequences of climate change, and make it illegal for people such as myself to attempt to prevent them doing so. To me, this indicates that our current laws regarding such matters are wrong and in urgent need of regress.

Of course, in a democracy such as ours one can always use legal channels to change the law. In a basic way this is true. But to this basic truth I would attach two important caveats.

First, in the case of climate change the picture is more complicated. Greenhouse pollution diffuses across the globe, so the actions of any democratic society produce consequences that affect more people than just those able to participate in its democracy. Australian adults, for example, are able to campaign to change Australian law, but citizens of other countries cannot realistically do so, nor can members of other species, anyone still too young to have a public voice, or future generations. If the justification for democracy is that people deserves a say over decisions that effect them, then climate change presents us with a case in which this very justification may call for people within a democracy to step outside the bounds of their current law in order to protect the interests of those who cannot affect those laws, but who are nonetheless affected by them.

Second, I have tried legal channels. I have spent countless hours volunteering, campaigning, leafleting, letterboxing and doorknocking to promote responsible action on climate change. In 2009 I even went about as far as one can go via legal forms of political protest, starving myself two thirds (give or take) of the way to death on a 43 day water-only hunger strike outside our Parliament House in Canberra calling for climate action.

All these legal forms of political participation make a difference, and I do not repudiate them. I believe, however, that history shows civil disobedience to have an important and vital role to play in achieving social change.

People with a conscience have been violating what they see as immoral laws for millennia, and I personally believe it is a damn good thing that they have done so, for our civilization would not be where it is today if they had not.

I also believe, in the context of climate change, that it is only by people continuing to stand up for what is morally right, rather than what is simply legal, that our species stands a chance of getting ourselves out of the mess we are creating for ourselves.

But ideology and rhetoric aside, I do recognise that you have a job to do, and I only ask that when sentencing me you keep in mind the nature of my actions – that they were peaceful, that they harmed no one, and that they were born of nothing but compassion and a sense of moral duty to the victims of climate change, present and future.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Connor

December, 2011

So I haven’t updated paulconnor.org in ages. I’ve been pretty busy with my climate group, which in the past few months have rebranded ourselves with a new name ‘Quit Coal’. Here’s the logo I’ve designed for us:

And here is the Quit Coal website. which i’ve spent countless hours designing and setting up using a pretty cool wordpress theme called ‘Corona’.

This is a quick video I put together of a Christmas-themed media stunt/day of outreach by Quit Coal.

We Don’t Want Coal For Christmas! from Quit Coal on Vimeo.

This is a video I made of my anti-coal collective’s recent peaceful direct action out in Bacchus Marsh. It took me a while to finish whilst simultaneously learning to use Apple’s video editing software Final Cut Pro rather than the more easy to use but limited IMovie. The song is a short version of Go Count Your Money by my band Wildcat General Strike. Enjoy!

On Monday this week a small group of Stop HRLians woke before dawn and drove 60 kilometers West of Melbourne to Bacchus Marsh. I rode shotgun, filming everything for a video I would like to make about the day. Neil drove. Shaun, Maude and Maddie were in the backseat.

We made the trip to perform a peaceful direct action against Mantle Mining, who are currently undertaking exploratory drilling in the area and hoping to dig an open cut mine in order to establish a brand new international brown coal export industry.

It’s hard to explain how crazy it would be for Victoria to start exporting brown coal to the world, but I’m willing to try. If you already know that it’s crazy to start exporting brown coal from Victoria, I don’t know, skip over this bit.

In Victoria, we have a lot of brown coal. That’s why almost all of our electricity is generated by digging it up and burning it, which boils water, spins turbines, and voila, electricity. And that’s also why Victoria’s per capita greenhouse emissions are among the highest in the world, what with brown coal being so dirty and all.

But now, thanks to Australia’s new carbon price legislation, Victorian power is being dragged kicking and screaming away from it’s dirty brown coal-flavored teat and into the mid-20th century. Yes, you heard correctly. The Labor government’s tragi-comically inadequate one-fifth-the-scientifically-accepted-minimum carbon pricing legislation is actually going (eventually) to price brown coal out of the electricity market. That’s just how polluting brown coal is – you can’t even burn it in Australia anymore.

Yet like any kicking and screaming little brat, the Victorian brown coal industry is refusing to go to bed peacefully. Instead, a new plan is emerging – if we can no longer make money here out of the stuff, maybe we can make money elsewhere out of it? After all, there are countries out there whose poverty and low historical emissions means they don’t have to do as much on climate change as us, which as a result of our ineffectual efforts means they really don’t have to do anything. So…maybe we can sell them our brown coal?

To date, this kind of thinking has been thwarted by a lucky happenstance in physics. You couldn’t export brown coal simply because it would catch fire if it came in contact with air. And air is fairly ubiquitous in the majority of our trading partners. But rather than recognise what seems to have been a fairly blatant hint from the Gods regarding the favor with which they view brown coal exports, a company named Exergen has now devised a method of drying out brown coal, rendering it capable of being transported vast distances and burnt in countries with less ‘ambitious’ emissions targets than our own. Read the rest of this entry »

This Op Ed was published on Crikey’s ‘Rooted’ blog on Tuesday, giving rise to the War-And-Peace-Epic 11,000 word comment war I’ve included below for shits and giggles.

Don’t be fooled, Mantle are in it for the money

Few could accuse Mantle Mining company director Ian Kraemer of lacking rhetorical ambition. Attending a public meeting in Bacchus Marsh last week to explain his plan to turn local farmlands into a brown coal mine, Kraemer was keen to talk up his environmental credibility. ‘Brown coal’, he told locals present, ‘has the ability to be the saviour of the planet’.

Now, given brown coal’s status as one of the world’s most polluting fossil fuels, this seems an odd statement. Yet Kraemer is adamant it can be defended. Mantle, he says, plans to use a special technique developed by another company, Exergen, to remove moisture from the coal, thereby reducing its greenhouse emissions by up to 40%. Given that countries such as China and India are likely to use brown coal for some time to come, he argues, it makes good environmental sense to help them to burn it in a cleaner way.

But can we trust Kraemer’s reasoning here? To begin, let’s examine the claim that Exergen’s coal-drying technology will reduce greenhouse emissions from burning brown coal by up to 40%. A quick review of the company’s very own promotional material shows how deceitful that figure really is. Read the rest of this entry »

Last Thursday I was arrested for trespassing at the office of a Melbourne finance company named Cygnet. Myself and three other protestors chained ourselves together in Cygnet’s foyer to demand a meeting with their director to discuss their decision to finance Mantle Mining’s plans to establish a brown coal export industry out of Bacchus Marsh in Victoria.

Me on the phone chained up in Cyget's office. The bearded copper behind us made a point of saying he agreed with what we were doing.

We did so alongside Bacchus Marsh locals, under the banner of ‘Farms Not Fossil Fuels’, a campaign title devised by the Stop HRL collective and put into the graphic form below by yours truly. A funny moment occurred during the protest when the managing director of Cygnet told these locals that ‘this is our area, you can’t be here!’ The locals, who are being told that they have no power to stop mining companies drilling on their properties and possibly taking their land, completely sympathized.

Read the rest of this entry »

What have I been up to lately? A lot of rehearsing with the band, a bit of getting dodgy hipster haircuts(!), a fair bit of hand therapy for my broken hand (long story) and a fair bit of this (it’s a video I wrote, scored and directed for the Stop HRL crew I’m in here in Melbourne):

I’m here today as a representative of the Stop HRL collective, a grassroots community group working alongside our partners at Environment Victoria, Greenpeace and Friends Of The Earth to stop HRL.

Our group are all volunteers, choosing to put our own time and effort towards stopping HRL. Since we got together earlier this year we’ve been spreading awareness of HRL in communities, a events, and in the media after occupying Ted Ballieu’s office last month and after pulling 60 to the EPA’s office last Friday with only two hours notice to protest their approval of HRL.

The reason the Stop HRL collective is doing all this is simple. James Hansen, the chief climate scientist of NASA in the USA, has said that ‘coal is the single greatest threat to civilisation and all life on our planet’.  Now that is a pretty amazing quote, and it probably bears repeating. James Hansen, the brilliant scientist. Often called ‘the grandfather of climate science’. That is what he has said. Coal is the single greatest threat to civilisation and all life on our planet. Read the rest of this entry »

Two weeks ago Tim DeCristopher, the US climate activist charged with disrupting an auction of land parcels for fossil fuel exploration by entering the auction and bidding for land, was found guilty in a Salt Lake City courtroom.  He now faces up to 10 years imprisonment, with his sentencing scheduled for June 23rd.

During his trial, Tim’s defence was not allowed to mention that the auction he disrupted was itself illegal, and that all of its sales were later overturned.

They were also not allowed to mention that he had in fact been able to raise enough money from supporters to afford the initial deposit on the land he had bid for.

And finally, they were also not even allowed to mention Tim’s motivation for entering the auctions – to stand in the way of the enormous threat of climate change, and to protect his future.

Tim took a courageous stand. As Naomi Klein has noted, it is ironic that he stands to be imprisoned because he had no intention of paying for his bids, while oil and gas companies are free to profit from the use of fossil fuels with absolutely no intention of paying the costs of the climate change they cause. Bill Mckibben has said of DeCristopher ‘he should be getting a medal, not a sentence….He was brave by himself; we need to be brave in quantity.’

Tim is a complete bloody hero, and just what each of us needs to be as members of what Simon Sheikh from the Australian group GetUp calls ‘the last line of defence for mother nature’ – the very last generation with a chance to act on climate change.

Tim needs our help and solidarity right now. Please go to his website to donate towards his defence fund and find out how else to help him, and join this facebook cause calling for Obama to pardon him.

Whoah.

I haven’t posted anything here in a looong time. After finishing my thesis the sight of microsoft word tended to induce me to rock back and forth in the fetal position and sweat profusely. But I’m OK now. I’m back. I think.

This is just a note I put on facebook tonight, reflecting about the terrifying cyclone that tonight is smashing into the north-east of my country. I have a number of facebook ‘friends’ who really aren’t very environmental, and I was wondering if perhaps this cyclone might be a way to reach some of them and engage them in a discussion of climate change. It started as a status update, but I then just kept on typing. There’s a lot that needs to be said.

Anyway, it went like this:

Hi, facebook friends.

Any of you not sure what you should do with your life? Well, I want you to look at the cyclone hitting Australia now. Cyclones are more intense now, and more frequent, as a result of climate change. But here’s the thing – the climate hasn’t even CHANGED that much yet. Read the rest of this entry »

This article was published in Adbusters #91, the  ’I, Revolution’ issue. Right at the back. But that’s cool, because I read magazines back-to-front. Don’t know why, just do. :)

It’s late. Maybe 2, or 3am, and I’m scanning my email inbox for anything important I might have missed. Eventually I notice a message that lists the names of two famous activists – Bill Mckibben and Naomi Klein – in its subject header.

The email is a ‘call to action’ soliciting support for Tim DeCristopher, a climate change activist who faces 10 years in jail after disrupting an auction of oil and gas leases in Utah.

I’m interested in this, and not just because of the facts – that by his fake bidding, DeCristopher prevented the Bush administration selling off 14 parcels of land for fossil fuel extraction – and is being prosecuted despite the new US administration ruling that the land had been inappropriate for sale. I’m actually interested largely because I’ve recently been thinking a lot about jail, and wondering about what role it might play in the peoples movement for just action on climate change. So I want to know more about Tim DeCristopher.

On his website (www.bidder70.org) there is a video of DeCristopher speaking at a climate rally in Salt Lake City last October. An athletic-looking 26-year-old with a shaved head and intense eyes, he speaks loudly and succinctly, like a charismatic churchman in full swing. At times he even breaks into gospel song.

There is more than a hint of spirituality in his speech, too. He tells the crowd of his personal awakening – that every day since his action, despite knowing he may soon be behind bars, he has walked a little taller, and felt a little more free. He also offers them a form of salvation, promising that it will be the social struggle for a safe climate and sustainable future that will make us the truly noble beings we were meant to be. Read the rest of this entry »

« Older entries